How convincing is the kalam argument

Here, Craig is very specifically speaking about an efficient cause, and to his credit, the Kalam only references causes in terms of efficient causes. These features of the natural world are then used as evidence for an intelligent, intentional designer of the world.

Inductive reasoning from both common experience and scientific evidence, which constantly verifies and never falsifies the truth of the first premise.

Narrative and the Problem of Suffering. How convincing is the kalam argument part of an infinite set is equal to the whole of the infinite set, because both the part and the whole are infinite.

However, an omnipotent and omniscient being could have prevented them from occurring, and an omnibenevolent being would have not allowed any significant pointless evils to occur if they could have been avoided. Without getting too technical, it was mathematically proven that for any constantly expanding space-time universe, that universe is geodesically incomplete into the past.

For any readers that want a better explanation of the phenomenon described here, I highly recommend starting with a general reference on Wikipedia [15], or watching some YouTube videos that can illustrate the relativity of simultaneity [16][17].

These evils do not seem to occur because of the free choices of moral creatures. For our purposes it is enough to state that both Special and General Relativity have been confirmed by a wealth of experimental evidence, as have critical non-intuitive consequences of Special Relativity such as time dilation [18], length contraction [19], and the relativity of simultaneity [20].

Another objection to this theodicy is that it was crafted in a pre-scientific culture and thus is devoid of an evolutionary view of the development of flora and fauna, including such elements as predation and species annihilation.

Fallen human beings prefer pleasure and power over the greater goods, and as such human beings are not properly internally integrated around the ultimate and proper good.

Mapping the Kalam: Introduction and Index

Since an infinite temporal regress of events is an actual infinite set of events, such a regress is metaphysically impossible. In that case, the rapist will be unable to engage in the attack.

Assert the existence of an unnecessary and undetectable preferred reference frame the etherthat we have absolutely no scientific evidence for.

Using a child-parent analogy, an analogy which is often used in the Abrahamic traditions themselves, Schellenberg notes that good parents are present to their children, especially when they are in need. For example, if you look at the statue of David, you would say that the artist Michelangelo is the efficient cause, where as a slab of marble was the material cause.

The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology.

Kalam cosmological argument

For example, it seems exceedingly unfair that one child is born healthy into a wealthy, loving family, whereas another child is born sickly into a poor, cruel environment.

These scientists are working on what is currently the most promising model for the beginning of our space-time universe: The past continuously grows as one moment after another passes from the future into the present and then into the past.

In reply, it can be argued that apparently pointless evils are not always, in fact, without purpose and merit. The problem, concisely stated, can be put this way. This post is the first in a two part series. Given that such observers do exist, it should not be surprising that the laws and constants are just as they are.

This uses terminology defined by John M. We know that God is not Himself a physical part of the universe. Science and the Kalam - By JHendrix of http: If successful, the cosmological argument only provides evidence for a transcendent first cause of the universe, nothing more; at best, the teleological argument provides evidence for a purposive, rational designer of the universe, nothing more; and so on.

But, on what basis can such a claim be made? Stenger has referred to the Aguirre-Gratton model [46] for eternal inflation as an exemplar by which others disagree with the Borde-Guth-Vilenkin theorem.

Mystical Experience of God: Never one to disappoint, apologists like William Lane Craig directly try to argue that the singularity being infinite actually means its equivalent to literally nothing: An uncaused, personal Creator of the universe exists, who sans the universe is beginningless, changeless, immaterial, timeless, spaceless and infinitely powerful.

However, reasonable nonbelief does occur. An intimate, loving, eternal relationship with God, for example, may well be a good that is infinite and incomparable with any other kind of good.

This is the same form of argument deductive used by Sherlock Holmes in his cases. Craig appeals to the standard Big Bang Model which posits a universe of finite age. The remainder of this essay will review the argument, discuss its two premises and respond to critics of the argument.

Accept a much more complex theory to explain all of the available data supporting Special Relativity 2. God would make himself known to them so that they would believe. Therefore, the universe has some kind of cause of its existence. The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil.

A third reply is to deny the third premise. While this is a more complex definition, it is required for understanding the science being discussed.Kalam Cosmological Argument, only if one is a Platonist is the admission of mathematical actual infinities incompatible with the claim that an actual infinitecannotexist.""SolongasFormalism,Conceptualism,orNominalism.

One of the most interesting and widely discussed arguments for the existence of God is the kalam cosmological argument, which attempts to prove that it is impossible for the universe to.

May 31,  · I'm trying to learn more about evidence and philosophical arguments for the existence of God. I've looked at the popular arguments used by Christian apologists (including the Kalam argument by William Craig), but I'm still not really convinced that the.

Some of these are particularly convincing in my view & I therefore feel rationally justified in my belief – most persuasive is Jesus’ resurrection which is supplemented by religious experience, the reality of miracles & the Kalam Cosmological Argument, to name a few.

· Cosmological Argument Page 3 of 5 himself in the following quote: “There could be no simpler explanation than one which postulates only one cause. Theism is simpler than polytheism.” (B) Consider the view that the strengths are more  · In natural theology and philosophy, a cosmological argument is an argument in which the existence of a unique being, generally seen as some kind of god, is deduced or inferred from facts or alleged facts concerning causation, change, motion, contingency, or finitude in respect of the universe as a whole or processes within

How convincing is the kalam argument
Rated 4/5 based on 76 review